<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It could cost up to £29bn to provide fibre-based broadband to the whole of the UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://consultantvalueadded.com/2008/09/09/it-could-cost-up-to-29bn-to-provide-fibre-based-broadband-to-the-whole-of-the-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://consultantvalueadded.com/2008/09/09/it-could-cost-up-to-29bn-to-provide-fibre-based-broadband-to-the-whole-of-the-uk/</link>
	<description>“It is because of my wish to be helpful that I share my ideas and experiences; being helpful to even one person is valuable.” Dalai Lama</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 10:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadband ‘partnership’ in the UK? &#171; Consultant Value Added</title>
		<link>http://consultantvalueadded.com/2008/09/09/it-could-cost-up-to-29bn-to-provide-fibre-based-broadband-to-the-whole-of-the-uk/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broadband ‘partnership’ in the UK? &#171; Consultant Value Added]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consultantvalueadded.wordpress.com/?p=221#comment-25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] In a consultation paper, Ofcom noted that it was “highly unlikely that the private sector will deliver truly national coverage” and suggested that the government look at geographic areas that are identified as remaining under-served in the future, and play a part in the coordination of the rollout. This assessment is highly in line with our post “It could cost up to £29bn to provide fibre-based broadband to the whole of the UK”. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a consultation paper, Ofcom noted that it was “highly unlikely that the private sector will deliver truly national coverage” and suggested that the government look at geographic areas that are identified as remaining under-served in the future, and play a part in the coordination of the rollout. This assessment is highly in line with our post “It could cost up to £29bn to provide fibre-based broadband to the whole of the UK”. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

